The ‘culture-war’ school board playbook is burning through public school dollars

TVUSDMVUSDTemeculaMurrietaSchool Board
Written By J. Pack

Temecula & Murrieta are now paying the same tab

1TVPAC Team

When ideologues seize local school boards, they don’t just inflame meetings. They run up bills. A first-of-its-kind study from UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access tallied the national price tag of these culture-war fights—legal fees, investigations, security, PR, and staff time—and found U.S. districts spent about $3.2 billion in 2023–24 responding to politically manufactured conflict. That’s money not spent on teachers, tutoring, arts, buses, or repairs. 

The Costs of Conflict:The Fiscal Impact of Culturally Divisive Conflict on Public Schools in the United States

The national pattern: lawsuits, consultants, severance—and classrooms starved

  • Central Bucks, Pennsylvania. Under a hard-right majority, the district hired Duane Morris LLP to “investigate” LGBTQ discrimination allegations and fight related complaints. The bills? $1.75 million to the firm—so large an outside lawyer later flagged “excessive” and “seriously inflated” invoices. Insurance covered only a fraction. That’s real classroom money burned on a political agenda. 

Duane Morris billed Central Bucks $1.75 million to address anti-LGBTQ complaints

  • Sarasota County, Florida. A Moms for Liberty–aligned majority abruptly fired the superintendent; the board’s own counsel said the district owed at least $170,000 in severance and benefits—before deeper litigation even started.

Local pattern: Temecula & Murrieta are repeating the same expensive mistakes

Temecula Valley Unified (TVUSD). After a extreme-right board majority took power in late 2022, the district’s legal expenses exploded—up 377% year-over-year, according to a report that cited district financials. That spike coincides with headline-grabbing fights over “CRT,” public-comment clampdowns, and textbook theatrics. 

Temecula Valley’s Legal Fees Up 377% Since School Board Takeover

The most famous stunt: refusing to adopt a state-approved social studies curriculum because it mentioned Harvey Milk. Governor Gavin Newsom publicly warned the district the state would buy the books, send TVUSD the bill, and levy a $1.5 million fine for violating state law. Under that pressure, the board reversed course and adopted the curriculum days later—an avoidable fiasco with real fiscal exposure.

Temecula Valley Unified board unanimously approves previously rejected textbooks

Separately, a California appellate court blocked Temecula’s “CRT ban” in May 2025, siding with students and teachers who argued the rule was vague and chilled instruction—another self-inflicted legal morass that has cost the district already $50,000 in legal fees and an expected settlement fee of more than $1 million.

Murrieta Valley Unified (MVUSD). The board adopted a “parental notification” policy targeting trans and nonbinary students, despite an investigation by the California Department of Education finding it discriminatory. The district oscillated—first saying it wouldn’t enforce it, then defying the state order, then ultimately rescinding the policy in October 2024. In the meantime, administrators and counsel burned hours (and dollars) navigating the fallout. Local coverage warned the district could incur roughly $500,000 in legal fees over the controversy alone. 

That’s the cost of politics, not pedagogy.

Murrieta school board keeps parental notification policy, defying state order

Murrieta Valley USD Won't Enforce Parental Notification Policy

Approval to Rescind Board Policy 5020.1 - Parental Notification

Context from nearby districts matters. California’s courts have enjoined or struck down copy-cat “forced outing” policies (notably in Chino Valley USD), underscoring the legally risky path Murrieta was racing down. When boards pass legally suspect rules, taxpayers end up paying to defend them—and to unwind them.

What all this spending actually buys (besides nothing for kids)

The pitch behind these takeovers is “fiscal responsibility” and “local control.” The results are the opposite: 

  • blank checks to outside law firms and consultants

  • severance packages for abruptly ousted administrators

  • staff time diverted from learning to litigation

  • extra security costs for school board meetings

  • lower district reputation, making it difficult to hire excellent teachers and administrators

  • PR campaigns to clean up the mess

  • insurance deductibles, premiums, and payouts that ripple for years. 

UCLA’s researchers found a typical 10,000-student district at “moderate” conflict spends nearly $500,000 annually just managing the political chaos. Scale that to “high conflict,” and the number balloons.

Cultural Conflict Comes with a Cost For Public Schools

In Temecula and Murrieta, the pattern is clear: pass performative, litigation-bait policies; dare the state or civil-rights groups to sue; bleed the general fund on outside counsel; and then, after months of noise, quietly rescind or lose in court—while classrooms go without. 

A better way forward for Temecula & Murrieta

  • Re-center budgets on instruction. Require fiscal notes before passing any policy touching civil rights or curriculum—what will it cost in legal review, staff hours, risk exposure, and likely litigation? If the answer is “six figures and a court fight,” the default should be no. (See what happened in Central Bucks and Newberg.) 

Parents take Newberg School District, board members to trial

  • Stop passing policies that violate state laws. California has robust education and civil-rights frameworks. Boards that freelance culture-war ordinances are not exercising “local control”; they’re writing checks district budgets can’t cash. Chino Valley’s injunctions are a cautionary tale.
    California Attorney General’s Statement 

  • Hire superintendents to educate, not litigate. The Sarasota and Berkeley County sagas show how churn at the top multiplies costs. But we don’t need to look that far. The far-right Temecula School Board fired TVUSD’s highly capable Superintendent in 2022 without cause, costing the district $362,000 to buy out her contract. (She could have sued but chose not to.) Stability and competence are cheaper than severance and lawsuits.

Temecula School Board Fires Superintendent Jodi McClay
Former Berkeley County superintendent gets thousands from state after lawsuit

Temecula and Murrieta don’t have to be case studies in how to siphon dollars from classrooms into courtrooms. But that requires voters and board members to treat culture-war provocations for what they are: very expensive distractions.

Sources (selected)

California Attorney General’s Statement

  • Temecula: legal-fee spike; textbook fight and $1.5M threat; CRT injunction; firing superintendent. 

Temecula Valley’s Legal Fees Up 377% Since School Board Takeover

Governor Newsom Announces Contract to Secure Textbooks for Students in Temecula

Temecula Valley Unified board unanimously approves previously rejected textbooks

Temecula School Board Fires Superintendent Jodi McClay 

  • Murrieta: non-enforcement notice, defiance, and ultimate rescission; projected legal costs.

Murrieta school board keeps parental notification policy, defying state order

Murrieta Valley USD Won't Enforce Parental Notification Policy

Approval to Rescind Board Policy 5020.1 - Parental Notification

J. Pack https://www.ranchwood.co
Previous

Opinion: Let Parents Opt Out — If They Want Their Kids Left Behind, That’s Their Choice
Next

Why did Nick Pardue present political rhetoric as ‘history’ at last night’s MVUSD school board meeting